Introduction
I was thinking today about some of the many calls I take each month, over 100, and how people have become total zombies, disconnected from reality. Specifically, I was thinking about how inhuman we've become.
Children tell their parents they will "Google it" rather than ask a trusted adult with experience. Instead of communicating, men and women in relationships track their partner with GPS to see if they're being faithful. Some of my calls even end with a person saying they'll just see if they can find the information themselves through some website that spits out old data, never giving any context.
We need to be human again; humanity is what makes the world go round, not technology. Without humans, there would be no technology. Instead of canned responses such as "Google it," why can't we say, "think about it" or "ask someone"? We've become people of instant gratification.
Even when people visit my website, their interactions often last mere seconds. They only scroll a little bit before flitting off somewhere else. This isn't because we don't have a robust site—we do, with over 120 articles and countless resources. It's because people can't be bothered. Bothered to read, to explore, to think deeply. They can't even be bothered to scroll a few more inches down the screen. And that, to me, is a troubling sign of how much we've lost our way in this technology-driven world.
From Instant Gratification to Genuine Understanding: The Lost Art of Thinking, Consulting, and Learning in a Tech-Driven World
Every day, we're fed the narrative that technology, with its algorithms and data-driven insights, knows best. We’re told that machines can make better decisions, that data can reveal absolute truths, and that technology is the ultimate authority. But this is a dangerous illusion. Machines do what they are programmed to do; they process information based on predefined rules and patterns. They can’t think, feel, or understand the nuances of human experience. Data, no matter how vast or detailed, is just a collection of numbers without the human interpretation that gives it meaning.
Take the news, for example. Headlines are often written to grab attention, sometimes at the expense of truth. In our modern world, it’s all too common for people to accept what they read or see without question, assuming that because it’s printed, it must be true. But news outlets have agendas—political, economic, or otherwise—and they can mislead, distort, or omit information to serve those interests. Without a human touch—without individuals who question, interpret, and seek deeper understanding—we are left with a version of reality that may be far from the truth.
A striking example of this can be seen in the rise of AI-generated content. There have been instances where AI-written articles, presented as factual and objective, contained errors or misinterpretations that went unnoticed by readers. People accepted these AI-generated pieces as gospel simply because they appeared authoritative. This blind trust in technology can lead to misinformation being spread and accepted as truth, without the necessary human scrutiny to catch and correct errors.
The Danger of Accepting Without Question
The convenience of technology often leads us to accept information at face value. We turn to search engines for answers, trusting the first result we see. We rely on social media for news, not questioning the biases or motivations behind what’s shared. But in doing so, we risk becoming passive consumers of information, letting machines and data dictate our understanding of the world. This passive acceptance is dangerous. It strips us of our agency and our ability to think critically about the information we receive.
Consider how misinformation spreads online. A sensationalized headline or a misleading statistic can go viral in minutes, influencing public opinion and even policy decisions before the truth comes to light. This is not just a problem with the technology itself, but with our over-reliance on it. We must remember that data and information are only as good as the context and interpretation we apply to them. Machines can’t provide that context—only humans can.
A glaring example of this was during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, where various AI-driven models and predictions circulated widely, causing panic. These models, based on data without full context, often led to misguided decisions and public fear. In hindsight, many of these predictions were proven incorrect, underscoring the importance of human interpretation in understanding data and making decisions.
Mark Zuckerberg has created a public apology for spinning narratives with Facebook, and US Senators are still probing the failures of the NHS and it's leaders. People didn't think, they listened to the narrative.
The Importance of Being Human
Being human means more than just processing information; it means understanding it. It means questioning what we’re told, seeking out multiple perspectives, and using our experiences and emotions to interpret the world around us. This human ability to think critically, to empathize, and to apply ethical reasoning is irreplaceable.
In a world that increasingly values efficiency and automation, we must resist the temptation to think like machines. We need to act like humans—using our unique abilities to navigate complex situations, to connect with others, and to find meaning in our experiences. This is especially important in areas where interpretation is key, such as law, medicine, education, and journalism. In these fields, the human touch is not just important; it’s essential.
Human Interpretation vs. Data
Data alone is not enough. Without interpretation, data is just a collection of numbers, facts, or figures. It doesn’t tell the whole story. For example, a machine might analyze the data from a patient’s medical records and suggest a treatment based solely on patterns in the data. But a human doctor considers much more: the patient’s history, their emotional state, their personal preferences, and their unique circumstances. This is the difference between a machine that processes data and a human who understands it.
In journalism, the difference is even starker. A machine might churn out an article based on trending topics or popular keywords, but it won’t consider the deeper implications of the story, the ethical dilemmas, or the impact on the people involved. It won’t ask the tough questions or challenge the status quo. That’s something only a human journalist can do.
Resisting the Machine Mindset
The challenge we face today is not just in using technology wisely, but in resisting the mindset that machines and data know best. We need to cultivate our human capacities—our critical thinking, our empathy, our creativity—to ensure that we remain the interpreters of the world around us. We must remember that while machines can assist us, they cannot replace the human mind.
At Spade & Archer, a private investigation firm, this human touch is central to our work. We understand that data alone is not enough. It’s the human interpretation that brings data to life, making it relevant and actionable. Whether we’re uncovering hidden assets, conducting background checks, or solving complex cases, it’s our human insight, experience, and intuition that make the difference.
HUMINT Human Intelligence
Often regarded as boots on the ground intelligence, human intelligence (HUMINT) plays a critical role in the intelligence cycle, often providing insights that surpass the value of other forms of intelligence, such as Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Imagery Intelligence (IMINT).
While SIGINT and IMINT rely on intercepting communications and analyzing imagery, they often lack the nuanced understanding and context that only human sources can provide. HUMINT offers the unique advantage of human context—insights drawn from direct interactions, observations, and the interpretation of complex social dynamics.
Governments rely on HUMINT to gather information that machines and technology alone cannot capture, such as the intentions, motivations, and emotions of key individuals. This reliance on HUMINT underscores the broader theme of this article: in a tech-driven world, human intelligence and context are irreplaceable.
Just as HUMINT provides depth and clarity in intelligence gathering, human interpretation and critical thinking offer a deeper understanding of the world, ensuring that decisions are informed not just by data, but by the rich, complex reality that only human insight can reveal.
Human Intelligence in Government and Military Context
HUMINT is particularly valuable because it can uncover the underlying motives behind actions, provide early warning of potential threats, and offer a more comprehensive understanding of complex situations. For instance, while SIGINT might reveal a conversation between hostile actors, it is HUMINT that can provide the cultural, social, and psychological context needed to interpret that conversation accurately. This makes HUMINT indispensable in formulating strategies, making informed decisions, and predicting future events with greater accuracy.
Governments and intelligence agencies heavily rely on HUMINT because it often provides the missing pieces that other forms of intelligence cannot. For example, in counterterrorism operations, it’s often HUMINT that identifies the key players and their networks, offering actionable intelligence that can prevent attacks. In diplomatic settings, HUMINT can reveal the true intentions behind a government’s public statements, offering a behind-the-scenes look at geopolitical dynamics that no satellite or intercepted signal could ever provide.
This emphasis on HUMINT directly relates to the broader theme of this article: the irreplaceable value of human intelligence and context in our increasingly tech-driven world. Just as HUMINT brings depth, nuance, and understanding to intelligence gathering, so too does human interpretation bring these qualities to our daily lives and decision-making processes.
In a world where we are often encouraged to rely on data, algorithms, and automated systems, the importance of maintaining and valuing our uniquely human capacities—such as critical thinking, empathy, and contextual understanding—cannot be overstated. Without these, we risk becoming overly dependent on technology, losing the very qualities that make us capable of fully understanding and engaging with the world around us.
Spade & Archer: A Human-First Private Investigation Firm
At Spade & Archer, we pride ourselves on being a human-first private investigation firm. This approach means we prioritize the human elements—judgment, empathy, ethical considerations—over raw data alone. We recognize that every case is unique, requiring more than just an analysis of facts. Our investigators rely on their ability to read between the lines, understand the subtleties of human behavior, and make connections that no machine could ever do.
Being human-first means listening to our clients, understanding their concerns, and approaching each investigation with a focus on integrity and compassion. We don’t just look for the quickest solution; we look for the right solution, one that takes into account the complexities and nuances of the situation. This human-centered approach ensures that our clients receive not only accurate information but also the context needed to make informed decisions.
Less Technology and More Wits
Being in the investigative business for 30 years, I can assure you that the private investigation industry is fond of spitting out data (data dumping) on their clients. Provide them with a name and birthdate and they will have a report to you in an hour. This report is just a data dump, where they input the information into an investigative data base and then email you the report.
There is no context, there is no real information, and just because it came from a data base that only private investigators can access (which is far more reliable than others) it doesn't mean one should accept that data without understand how the decision to deliver that information to a client goes beyond "it's what the computer says".
If You Want Crap Don't Come To Me
People want crap food because it's cheap. Then wonder why the feel so horrible. People call me wanting cheap service, and I don''t provide that. I think each night about the work I have done for the day, and go over the quality I have provided. This time of contemplation allows me to become better and provide our clients with better.
Conclusion
It’s easy to forget the importance of being human. But we must resist the temptation to let machines and data do our thinking for us. We need human context.
Some people feed their kids crap food such as donuts and insulin spiking carbs because that's what they think is right. But look at the diabetes and ADD many kids suffer from, in what I believe to be a pandemic, not an epidemic.
By the same token, we put junk in our brains and expect to have the correct meaning in life, or the answers because 'it was available quickly', or because you saw an article on Huffington Post.
Dunkin' Donuts is available quickly, does it mean you should eat it? Ask the American Diabetes Society.
We need to remember that while technology can provide information, it’s up to us to interpret it, to question it, and to find the deeper meaning. Being human means thinking critically, acting ethically, and using our unique abilities to understand the world in ways that machines never can. Only by embracing our humanity can we truly navigate the complexities of the modern world.
Comentários